[ad_1]
Olusanya is being attempted ahead of a Lagos Federal Top Courtroom over an alleged N152 million belongings fraud.
Justice Musa Kakaki admitted the letter as proof in a ruling on Thursday. The pass judgement on, then again, rejected 3 different paperwork dated January 10, January 11, 2024 and December 15, 2024, protecting that they had been photocopies and had no longer been correctly defined via the witness who sought to gentle them.
The ruling adopted objections raised all over the former complaints on July 20, 2026, when the prosecution sought to gentle them during the nominal complainant, Anthony Ugbebor.
At the February 5, 2024 be offering letter, the pass judgement on rejected the objection that Ugbebor was once no longer the maker of the report.
“One of the most grounds of the objections of January 10, January 11, and December 15, 2024, was once that the paperwork are photocopies. On July 20, 2026, the witness, thru whom the paperwork had been to be tendered, didn’t give any clarification of the place the unique paperwork had been.
“I additionally thought to be the submission of recommend at the report dated February 5, 2024, an objection of admissibility, that the nominal complainant isn’t the maker of the report, as there’s no such provision. The report dated February 5, 2024, is hereby admitted in proof,” the pass judgement on held.
Following the ruling, prosecuting recommend, Leader Superintendent of Police Monday Omo-Osagie, knowledgeable the court docket that he had an intervening time utility in a position for listening to, including that the defendants were served and had filed responses.
On the other hand, recommend for the primary defendant, Adeleke Agboola, SAN, wondered the prosecutor’s standing, announcing he had gained data that Omo-Osagie had retired from the police.
Agboola mentioned the prosecutor had to explain whether or not he was once showing underneath a fiat, including that he was once no longer served with the intervening time utility in his place of business.
“I used to be no longer served with the intervening time utility via the prosecutor. After I knowledgeable him this morning that he must have served my place of business, he informed me that he was once no longer obliged to serve me, including that he had served the primary defendant.
“The case ahead of the court docket lately was once a ruling and continuation of trial. He must name his witness or shut his case, in order that the defendant can open his case,” Agboola mentioned.
Suggest for the second one defendant, Jude Ehiedu, additionally requested the prosecutor to explain whether or not he was once showing underneath a fiat.
The prosecutor added that the applying involved the nominal complainant’s well being and was once distinct from an previous utility in the hunt for permission for the witness to testify just about as a result of he was once no longer resident in Nigeria.
Justice Kakaki, then again, mentioned he had no longer noticed the applying within the court docket record and directed the prosecutor to test the registry to ascertain whether or not it were correctly filed.
When the case resumed, Omo-Osagie informed the court docket {that a} seek on the registry showed that the applying were despatched to the court docket and signed for via a registrar in Kakaki’s court docket known as Elizabeth.
“My lord, this isn’t the primary time this shall be taking place; that is the second one time in a sequence. I might truly like one thing to be finished,” he mentioned, ahead of presenting any other replica of the applying to the court docket.
The prosecutor therefore moved the movement on understand, dated September 18 and filed on September 21, 2026.
He mentioned the applying was once supported via a 12-paragraph affidavit and a written deal with, which he followed in urging the court docket to grant the reliefs sought.
Ehiedu objected to the prosecution’s reaction to the defendants’ counter-affidavits, arguing that the prosecutor had no longer filed a answer on issues of regulation.
Omo-Osagie mentioned he had handiest gained the primary and 2nd defendants’ responses electronically on Monday.
Suggest for the primary defendant, Benson Nwosu, who stood in for Agboola, argued that the sooner utility, which the court docket brushed aside on June 23, 2026, sought digital testimony since the nominal complainant was once outdoor Nigeria.
He mentioned the prosecution may enchantment the sooner choice reasonably than record any other utility in the hunt for considerably the similar aid.
Nwosu additionally argued that the prosecution must shut its case if the witness may no longer seem in individual. He recommended the court docket to push aside the applying, whilst recommend for the second one defendant followed the primary defendant’s arguments and recommended the pass judgement on to succeed in the similar conclusion.
After taking note of the events, Justice Kakaki adjourned the case till December 3, 2026, for ruling at the utility.
[ad_2]
Source link
